6 EC
Semester 1, period 2
5244COLD6Y
| Owner | Master Brain and Cognitive Sciences |
| Coordinator | prof. dr. J.C. Schaeffer |
| Part of | Master Logic, Master Brain and Cognitive Sciences, |
Starting point for this course are a number of questions that are central in (psycho-)linguistic debates. These include discussions about language as a cognitive function, discussions concerning the effect of multilingualism on cognitive development, and the domain specificity/generality of language.
We will focus on how these issues are translated into empirical questions in language acquisition and language pathology. Students will learn with what kind of experimental methods these questions can be investigated and how experimental studies contribute to such debates.
The philosophy behind this course is that by studying these discussions in detail, the student will not only achieve more insight in some current notions in the study of (psycho-) linguistics, cognitive science and experimental methods, but also achieve some basic knowledge of the basics of linguistic theory in general and the way it has been shaped.
Central questions which will keep coming back in our classes are:
- What constitutes linguistic knowledge?
- How is this knowledge acquired?
- How is this knowledge physiologically encoded?
- How is this knowledge related to other cognitive functions/behavior?
The course consists of seven 4-hour seminars, each on a particular topic, in which students do most of the work and the teacher is there to coach, steer and support. Every article is read by the entire class and presented by a group of students who subsequently are put in charge of the discussion evolving after their presentation. The class as a group tries to identify problems and to solve these. It is the student’s task to make sure that (s)he understands the main lines of the research discussed and its implications. Given this course organization, being present and participating in class is a prerequisite for completing the course successfully.
General set-up for every seminar:
Activity | Number of hours |
Zelfstudie | 168 |
Requirements of the programme concerning attendance (OER-B):
| Item and weight | Details |
|
Final grade | |
|
0.02 (2%) Homework Week 2 | |
|
0.02 (2%) Homework Week 3 | |
|
0.02 (2%) Homework Week 4 | |
|
0.02 (2%) Homework Week 5 | |
|
0.02 (2%) Homework Week 6 | |
|
0.3 (30%) Position Paper | Must be ≥ 5.5, final grade |
|
0.2 (20%) Presentation | |
|
0.4 (40%) Take Home Exam |
The 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' applies to this course. This will be monitored carefully. Upon suspicion of fraud or plagiarism the Examinations Board of the programme will be informed. For the 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' see: www.student.uva.nl
| Weeknummer | Onderwerpen | Studiestof |
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 6 | ||
| 7 | ||
| 8 |
The schedule for this course is published on DataNose.
The course consists of seven 4-hour seminars, each on a particular topic, in which students do most of the work and the teacher is there to coach, steer and support. Every article is read by the entire class and presented by a group of students who subsequently are put in charge of the discussion evolving after their presentation. The class as a group tries to identify problems and to solve these. It is the student’s task to make sure that (s)he understands the main lines of the research discussed and its implications. Given this course organization, being present and participating in class is a prerequisite for completing the course successfully.
General set-up for every meeting:
In order to provide students some insight how we use the feedback of student evaluations to enhance the quality of education, we decided to include the table below in all course guides.
| Course Name (#EC) | N | |
| Strengths | Notes for improvement |
|
| Response lecturer: |
||