3 EC
Semester 1, period 3
5132FOFO3Y
In this course, students are challenged to develop research-based approaches that contribute to the urban food system, and in particular to the food system of the Amsterdam Metropolitan region. The course entails (1) a critical assessment of the current urban food system through food asset planning, (2) a critical evaluation of current tools and approaches used, and the performance of leading food agents, and (3) an advice consisting of policy recommendations for improving the urban food system. Students will present their insights and recommendations during a symposium with researchers, students and professionals.
The student research effort - embedded in a group assignment - starts from basic knowledge concepts which have been explored in preceding courses (in particular Food and the City in semester 1). Concepts such as food systems, transition management, Multi-Level Perspective, urban food policy and planning, collaborative planning, food asset mapping, and food councils will be operationalised and applied. Moreover, students are challenged to make a contribution to the process of food planning in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Region.
The following literature is aimed to get started and needs to be complemented with additional articles and books.
Defining your food system and food asset mapping
FAO (2018) City Region Food System Tools/Examples: City Region Food System Toolkit. Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/i9255en/I9255EN.pdf (Retrieved on 25 November 2021)
- Defining a City Region Food System: pp.1-2, 31-34
- Food asset mapping: pp.83-85, 86-89, 133-144
Overview of food planning tools
De Zeeuw, H. & Dubbeling, M. (2015) Process and tools for multi-stakeholder planning of the urban agro/food system. In: De Zeeuw, H. & Drechsel, P. (2015) Cities and Agriculture. Developing Resilient Urban Food Systems. London: Routledge, pp.56-87. https://ruaf.org/document/cities-and-agriculture-developing-resilient-urban-food-systems/ (Retrieved on 25 November 2021)
Sibbing, L., Candel, J., & Termeer, K. (2021). A comparative assessment of local municipal food policy integration in the Netherlands. International Planning Studies, 26(1), 56-69.
The course works towards the delivery of a series of group assignments (a report, a policy brief, and a presentation). The group assignments will be executed in groups of 4-5 students. Students are expected to demonstrate their progress on weekly basis.
Two introduction lectures are organised in which the assignments are explained, and more information regarding food asset mapping and food planning tools is provided.
Four working groups are organised to discuss the students' progress (e.g. presenting your work) and to receive feedback (from your fellow students and lecturers).
The final session of this course is a festive symposium in which each group will present his/her results not only to each other, but also to a group of researchers and professionals.
|
Activity |
Hours |
|
|
Lectures |
4 |
|
|
Presentation (including preparation) |
10 |
|
|
Working groups |
8 |
|
|
Group work |
56 |
|
|
Self-study (literature) |
6 |
|
|
Total |
84 |
(3 EC x 28 uur) |
Programme's requirements concerning attendance (OER-B):
Additional requirements for this course:
Students are obliged to attend at least 3 out of 4 working groups sessions. In case the student attends less, the practical sessions should be redone entirely.
| Item and weight | Details |
|
Final grade | |
|
0% Project design | Mandatory |
|
40% Food asset mapping | Must be ≥ 5.5 |
|
40% Policy brief | Must be ≥ 5.5 |
|
20% Presentation |
The groups are working towards three assignments, with deadlines throughout the course. The project design, food asset mapping and policy brief can be re-done in consultation with the lecturers. The presentation cannot be re-done.
| Learning objective | Food asset mapping | Food planning solutions | Presentation |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1. Identify the characteristics and institutional dynamics of an urban food system at various scales | X | X | |
| #2. Identify and value promising niches for transforming urban food systems | X | ||
| #3. Make a selection of relevant tools (e.g. provided in the City Region Food System Toolkit) in order to assess the food system in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Region | X | X | |
| #4. Translate innovative and sustainable solutions pertaining to the urban food system and food practices into policy recommendations | X | X | |
| #5. Critically reflect upon the opportunities and pitfalls of the policy recommendations identified, in particular in regard to the established institutional setting of the urban food system | X | X |
Inspection of assessed work will be communicated by Jaap Rothuizen, coordinating tutor on request. Contact Jaap through j.v.rothuizen@uva.nl.
The assignments have to be made in groups of 4-5 students.
Students will receive feedback from the tutors in the working groups, and from the course coordinator by e-mail.
Students are expected to complete four deliverables:
1.Research design (preparatory assignment; 0% weight)
2. Food asset mapping (40% weight)
3. Policy brief with solutions and food planning tools (40% weight)
4. Presentation (20% weight)
The 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' applies to this course. This will be monitored carefully. Upon suspicion of fraud or plagiarism the Examinations Board of the programme will be informed. For the 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' see: www.student.uva.nl
| Week | Contact moments |
Deadlines |
| 1 |
Lecture 1 - Introduction to the course Working group 1 - Project design + definition of urban food system |
|
| 2 |
Lecture 2 - Food asset mapping & food planning tools Working group 2 - Food asset mapping |
17 January: Assignment 1 - Project Design |
| 3 | Working group 3 - Food planning tools | 26 January: Assignment 2 - Food asset mapping |
| 4 |
Working group 4 - Feedback session Symposium - Presentations |
4 February: Assignment 4 - Presentation 7 February: Assignment 3 - Policy brief |
The schedule for this course is published on DataNose.
In order to provide students some insight how we use the feedback of student evaluations to enhance the quality of education, we decided to include the table below in all course guides.
| 5132FOFO3Y | ||
Strengths
|
Notes for improvement
|
|
Response lecturer:
|
||