3 EC
Semester 1, period 1
5132PHSC3Y
| Owner | Bachelor Future Planet Studies |
| Coordinator | dr. Coyan Tromp |
| Part of | Bachelor Future Planet Studies, year 2 |
In the third semester of Future Planet Studies, we focus on the complex issue of how to guarantee sufficient food for everyone while the world population increases up until an estimated 10 billion in 2050. The complexity of this global issue is such that it cannot be studied from a sole discipline. The same applies to the other ‘Grand Challenges’ that are the central focus of Future Planet Studies which – on a higher level – are all related to each other. They call for an interdisciplinary approach in which various perspectives are combined and integrated.
In the course Philosophy of Science, we look at differing perspectives from both the natural sciences as well as the social sciences and humanities, and investigate the potential contribution of these various approaches to finding explanations and solutions for our complex problems. Both conventional and newer approaches and models for grappling with challenges such as the world food issue are clarified, as well as their underlying assumptions. Their assets are highlighted, but we will also address the critique that has been brought forward against the various approaches.
Since no singular scientific method can fulfil all our needs, we explore the potential of complexity thinking for navigating alternative views on science. We examine whether it can perform the role of a meta-perspective in which the various models, perspectives and paradigms can be integrated into a more comprehensive approach to complex problems. This way, we aim to prepare students for multi-, inter- or transdisciplinary research on complex problems, not just with regard to the world food issue but to complex problems in general.
Besides gaining knowledge about prevailing traditional approaches and emerging new scientific approaches, the Philosophy of Science course also provides students with conceptual tools to enhance their critical and reflexive capacities. With these tools, students are enabled to critically analyse vital questions related to complex issues
In this course, the work groups form the backbone of the course, and we follow the principle of the flipped classroom. This means that you prepare before coming to class by studying the compulsory literature (Wicked Philosophy - Philosophy of Science and Vision Development for Complex Problems + additional articles), by watching the accompanying knowledge clips on Canvas, by formulating answers to the reading questions that you can find at the end of each chapter of Wicked Philosophy, and by making the Preparatory Assignments for each week.
In the first, introductory knowledge clips the aim of the course and the form of assessment are explained. In the other knowledge clips you can find an explanation of key concepts within the philosophy of (interdisciplinary) science.
In the work groups, we will jointly discuss philosophy of science topics from Wicked Philosophy. By reading the additional articles, you gain more in-depth insight in some of the core concepts of the course.
Besides addressing some pressing questions about the compulsory literature, we will also do exercises in the work groups. These exercises are questions from earlier Take Home Exams or this year’s Take Home Exam. Regularly you’ll need prepare for the exercise by making a preparatory assignment, so that you can actively participate in the work group.
Besides the work groups, there will be some question hours, which are spread out over the whole course.
For the work groups there is a strict attendance rule: if you’ve missed two work groups, your attendance at work groups will be graded with NA (Not Attended). This results in exclusion from the course. If for any reason you are going to miss a work group, you must inform your work group teacher in advance by sending an e-mail to announce your anticipated absence
The course schedule will be published and kept updated at www.datanose.nl.
Table 1: Study Load for Philosophy of Science
|
Subject |
amount |
Duration |
Total |
|
Watching introductory clips & knowledge clips that accompany the literature |
13 |
Variable (5- 15 minutes) |
3 |
|
Reading Philosophy of Science literature |
180 pages |
0.2 (5 pages per hour) |
36 |
|
Work Groups Philosophy of Science |
6 |
2 |
12 |
|
Working on the preparatory assignments for the Work Groups Philosophy of Science and the Take Home Exam |
13 |
|
33 |
|
Total |
|
|
84 |
Programme's requirements concerning attendance (OER-B):
Additional requirements for this course:
Not preparing for the work groups and missing deadlines to send in assignments will lead to exclusion from the work groups. If this happens more than twice you will be excluded from the course.
| Item and weight | Details |
|
Final grade | |
|
Final grade |
Table 2: Assessment, deadlines and exam dates
|
Type of Assessment |
Date / Deadline |
Weight |
Min. score |
Opportunity for re-sit / 2nd chance? |
Deadline re-sit / 2nd chance |
|
First Take Home Exam Philosophy of Science |
Week 2 or 3 (dependent on field work Future Earth track)
|
±25-35%
|
- |
The first Take Home Exam can be compensated with the second |
- |
|
Second Take Home Exam Philosophy of Science |
Week 8 |
±65-55% |
- |
If the combined results of the first and second Take Home Exam do not lead to a grade of 5.5 or higher, students can make use of the combined re-sit in January |
Friday 15 Jan 2021 23.59 The 2nd chance (integral) Take Home Exam will be made available on Canvas on Monday 11 Jan 2021 9.00 |
|
Argumentative writing |
Week 2 & 8 (forms integral part of the Take Home Exams) |
10% |
- |
No |
Included in re-sit |
|
Leerdoela |
Onderwijsb |
Toetsc |
Bloomniveaud |
Totaal gewichte |
|||||
|
Kennis |
Inzicht |
Toepassing |
Analyse |
Synthese |
Evaluatie |
||||
|
Acquire the skill to recognize the various models, perspectives and paradigms that are used within the broad range of science, i.e. the natural sciences, the social sciences and the humanities. |
Ch1- Ch3 behandeld in WG1 – WG6 en in knowledge clips, opdrachten en oefeningen in WG1 – WG6
|
Take Home Exam (THT) |
In principe niet, want open book examen en kernbegrip-pen zijn opgenomen in glossary |
a-vragen |
b- en c-vragen |
b- en c-vragen |
c- en d- vragen |
e- vragen (zelden) |
Niet aan te geven want verschillende leerdoelen komen aan bod in 1 en dezelfde vraag |
|
Gain insight in (the differences in) the underlying assumptions of these models, perspectives and paradigms and their implications for the research practice. |
Ch1- Ch3 behandeld in WG1 – WG6 en in knowledge clips, opdrachten en oefeningen in WG1 – WG6
|
Take Home Exam (THT) |
In principe niet, want open book examen en kernbegrip-pen zijn opgenomen in glossary |
a-vragen |
b- en c-vragen |
b- en c-vragen |
c- en d- vragen |
e- vragen (zelden) |
Niet aan te geven want verschillende leerdoelen komen aan bod in 1 en dezelfde vraag |
|
Students are able to integrate the various perspectives into a more comprehensive approach to complex problems, in particular the world food issue. |
Ch1- Ch3 behandeld in WG1 – WG6 en in knowledge clips, opdrachten en oefeningen in WG1 – WG6
|
Take Home Exam (THT) |
In principe niet, want open book examen en kernbegrip-pen zijn opgenomen in glossary |
a-vragen |
b- en c-vragen |
b- en c-vragen |
c- en d- vragen |
e- vragen (zelden) |
Niet aan te geven want verschillende leerdoelen komen aan bod in 1 en dezelfde vraag |
|
Learn how to use a range of conceptual tools, provided by philosophy of science, to make critical analyses and evaluations in the context of inter- and transdisciplinary study of complex issues. |
Ch1- Ch3 behandeld in WG1 – WG6 en in knowledge clips, opdrachten en oefeningen in WG1 – WG6
|
Take Home Exam |
In principe niet, want open book examen en kernbegrip-pen zijn opgenomen in glossary |
a-vragen |
b- en c-vragen |
b- en c-vragen |
c- en d- vragen |
e- vragen (zelden) |
Niet aan te geven want verschillende leerdoelen komen aan bod in 1 en dezelfde vraag |
|
Expand their academic skills and 21st century skills by further development of their argumentative reasoning in debate and dialogue as well as in writing, and by enhancement of their critical thinking skills and reflexive capacities.
|
Opdrachten en oefeningen in WG1 – WG6, oefenvragen, en maken van het take home tentamen zelf
|
Take Home Exam |
NVT het gaat niet om kennis hier maar om het leren gebruiken van tools |
NVT
|
Bij alle vragen |
NVT | NVT |
c- en d- vragen (soms e-vragen) |
Niet aan te geven want verschillende leerdoelen komen aan bod in 1 en dezelfde vraag |
|
TOTAAL e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 % |
The 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' applies to this course. This will be monitored carefully. Upon suspicion of fraud or plagiarism the Examinations Board of the programme will be informed. For the 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' see: www.student.uva.nl
| Weeknummer | Onderwerpen | Studiestof |
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 6 | ||
| 7 | ||
| 8 |
The schedule for this course is published on DataNose.
In order to provide students some insight how we use the feedback of student evaluations to enhance the quality of education, we decided to include the table below in all course guides.
| Course Name (#EC) | N | |
| Strengths | Notes for improvement |
|
| Response lecturer: |
||