Physical and Forensic Anthropology

6 EC

Semester 1, period 2

5274PHFA6Y

Owner Master Forensic Science
Coordinator dr. A.E. van der Merwe
Part of Master Forensic Science, year 2

Course manual 2020/2021

Course content

This course aims to provide students with a broad introduction to the use of scientific techniques within forensic anthropology, and their role in reconstructing the biological profile of individuals, the manner and cause of death and the postmortem interval. Using a range of targeted case studies and specialist literature, each topic will provide a clear overview of the development and current state of research including the limitations of each discipline especially concerning the reliability of the evidence in forensic criminal cases. Students will have the opportunity to assess the various research methods by way of lectures, practical sessions, presentations and review essays.

The examination of human remains is focused around several main themes. These are:

  • Human anatomy and physical anthropology;
  • Identification
  • Taphonomy;
  • Trauma analyses;
  • Specialized techniques.

Study materials

Literature

Practical training material

  • Descriptions and instruction associated with the practical sessions on Canvas of this course. You will receive a printed copy during the practical sessions.

Other

  • Lectures

    Self-study assignments on Canvas

Objectives

  • 1. Critically evaluate scientific literature and reports in the field of forensic
  • 2. Present scientific findings in oral presentation, debate, and writing.
  • 3. Apply practical techniques related to core forensic anthropological topics to
  • 4. Draw inferences on the biological profile (age, sex, stature and ancestry) of unknown
  • 5. Evaluate possibilities and limitations of practical techniques related to core forensic

Teaching methods

  • Lecture
  • Computer lab session/practical training
  • Presentation/symposium
  • Self-study

Lectures, self study assignments and practicals

Prior to each lecture, students are required to have read the necessary reading material (available on Canvas) which will be discussed during the lectures. The aim of the lectures in this course is to introduce concepts/methods to the student and discuss the shortcomings, advantages or implications associated with the various topics during active discussion.

Self study assignments are presented on Canvas to assist the student in studying topics which will be discussed during the lectures, assist in the preparation for practical sessions or aid the student in getting a more in depth knowledge on a specific topic.  It is the students own responsibility to complete the assignments and discuss questions which may arise with the lecturer during the practical sessions or lectures.  Students are not required to hand in the self study assignments.

Practical sessions are organised on various topics: f.i. human osteology, biological profiling (age and sex estimation) and cremated human remains. During these sessions students will get the opportunity to familiarize themselves with the human skeleton and practice various forensic anthropological techniques.

Learning activities

Activity

Hours

 

Lectures

32

 

Practical sessions

38

 

Report writing

8

 

Peer review

8

 

Presentation

16

 

Exam

3

 

Self study

63

 

Total

168

(6 EC x 28 uur)

Attendance

Additional requirements for this course:

Given the current situation surrounding Covid-19 attendance of lectures and practical sessions is  not compulsory. However, in order to ensure succesful completion of this course attendance of lectures and practicals are strongly adviced. Missing a class will severely hinder participation in the associated practical session. Lectures and practical sessions will not be recorded. In case of absence it is the students resposibility to make sure that he/she stays up to date and has sufficient knowledge with regards to the missed content. 

Assessment

Item and weight Details

Final grade

50%

Tentamen

Must be ≥ 5.5, Mandatory

30%

Skeletal Report - Written

Must be ≥ 5.5, Mandatory

20%

Skeletal Report - Presentation

Must be ≥ 5.5, Mandatory

All components will be graded on a scale from 1 to 10, with a maximum of one decimal after the point. These grades are used to calculate the final grade. In order to pass the course, all components and the final grade have to be sufficient, i.e. at least a five and a half. When a student has not fulfilled this requirement, the examiner will register the mark ‘did not fulfil all requirements’ (NAV) whether or not the averaged grade is sufficient.

The components will be weighted as follows:

1.  Skeletal report, written report (30%)
2: Skeletal Report, presentation (20%)
3. Written exam (50%)

The final grade will be announced at the latest 15 working days after the final course activity (January 18th). Between this date and 35 working days after the final course activity (February 15th), a post-exam discussion or inspection moment will be planned. This will be announced on Canvas and/or via email

 

Exit qualifications  

Learning outcome

Components (see above)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

1, 2

 

x

 

x

 

 

x

 

 

 

2

1, 2

 

 

 

 

 

x

 

 

x

 

3

1

 

x

 

x

 

x

 

 

 

 

4

1, 2, 3

 

x

 

x

 

 

x

 

x

 

5

1, 2, 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

x

x

 

 

Table of specification: the relation between the learning outcomes of the course (see objectives), the assessment components of the course  and the Exit Qualifications  of the Master’s Forensic Science (described in the Introduction in the Course Catalogue)

Assignments

Component 1 and 2: Skeletal Analysis- Written Report and Presentation

In groups of 2, students will be assigned a skeleton. For each skeleton, the students need to complete a full biological (age, sex, stature) profile estimation, trauma analysis and personal identification evaluation. Hereafter, the students need to write a report (example report will be provided) comprised of all the findings and the methods used. The report will be reviewed by two student colleagues and presented/defended in a groups session (max 15 min per presentation).

Grading of the report as well as the presentation will be conducted by two fellow students and two lecturers.

Fraud and plagiarism

The 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' applies to this course. This will be monitored carefully. Upon suspicion of fraud or plagiarism the Examinations Board of the programme will be informed. For the 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' see: www.student.uva.nl

Course structure

Week Onderwerpen Studiestof Deadlines
1

Introduction to Forensic Anthropology

Human Anatomy and Osteology

Lectures, practical, self-study assignment communicated on Canvas

 

2

Biological profiling I - Age and sex estimation

 

Lectures, practicals and self-study assignments communicated on Canvas  
3 Taphonomy and specialised techniques Lectures and  Self-study assignments communicated on Canvas  
4 Biological profiling II - Stature estimation and the concept of race Lectures, practicals and self-study assignments communicated on Canvas  
5 Cremations, trauma and disaster victim identification Lectures, practicals and self-study assignments communicated on Canvas  
6 Skeletal analysis All of the above  
7 Skeletal report and presentation on skeletal analysis All of the above

Submission skeletal report : Wednesday December 9, 17:00

Submission peer evaluation: Thursday December 10, 24:00

Presentation: Friday December 11, 09:00 - 13:00

8 Final written exam All of the above Friday December 18, 13:00

Timetable

The schedule for this course is published on DataNose.

Additional information

Coming to the AMC for practical sessions

When coming to the AMC for the practical sessions in this course, please adhere to the following rules:

  • Enter te building via one of the main entrances (1 and 2 on the map, not the faculty entrance).
  • You will be screened upon entry and receive wristband.
  • Come one time, there may be a row of people waiting to be screened.
  • The wristband must be worn visible when in the AMC.
  • Wearing a mask is obligatory.
  • Leave the building as soon as possible after the end of the practical.
  • Please see the website of the UvA and Amsterdam UMC location AMC describing the general information and Covid-related rules in the university buildings.

Once in the AMC please walk straight to our department keeping to following in mind:

  • Stay in faculty buildings (J0, K0, K01, L0, L01, L2).
  • For food and drink please visit the  AH-to-go on J0 and NOT the AH on the Voetenplein.
  • All practicals are given on L2 –N in 'snijzaal 1 and 2':
    • Take stairs to the second story between building K and L
    • Turn left on L2
    • Enter the first corridor on your left
    • Disinfect your hands at the swing doors
    • Enter ’snijzaal 1 and 2’, yellow door to your left before the swing doors

 

What to do in case of a possible Covid infection

Should you develop possible Covid-19 related symptoms or should you have been in contact with someone who is/was infected with the virus, please do not come the practicals and follow the decision chart of the UvA.

Last year's course evaluation

In order to provide students some insight how we use the feedback of student evaluations to enhance the quality of education, we decided to include the table below in all course guides.

Physical and Forensic Anthropology (6EC) N=16  
Strengths
  • The (guest)lectures were very interesting.
  • The course was well structured.
  • The lectures and follow-up practicals were positively evaluated.
Notes for improvement
  • The final report was graded by students instead of teacher. Students spent a lot of time on this report, and did not seem to appreciate to be graded by their peers.
  • It was not clear to the students that the peer gradings were checked by the teacher.
  • The grading by peers was not totally anonymous, during the presentation it was revealed who graded whom.
Response lecturer:
  • Again the course is evaluated really well. This year there was more current ongoing research implemented and the isotope assignment was cancelled to create more time for the final report.
  • The remarks about the peer review are surprising as this was conducted in the same way as last year without getting any specific remarks in the evaluation. As it is a small group it will probably never be totally anonymous. In addition, the teacher fears that if it is known beforehand that the teacher will check the grading, the peer review maybe will not conducted seriously enough. The remarks are also curious because the ability to give and receiving feedback is part of the professional skills students need to master and the check by the teacher is actually a failsafe so that students do receive the correct grade.
  • The coordinator is not in favour of providing a mock exam. If students participated in the lectures, done the practicals and final report, there is no reason for not knowing what’s in the exam. This is confirmed by the fact that over the past years nobody has failed the exam.

Contact information

Coordinator

  • dr. A.E. van der Merwe