Course manual 2019/2020

Course content

In forensic sciences a lot of techniques are observer based, meaning that they are mainly based on the comparison and evaluation of forensic traces by observation, not by measurement. The course Observer Based Techniques deals with the pros and cons of the numerous fields of forensic comparisons. During the course forensic techniques such as tool and ballistic marks, handwriting, fingerprints et cetera will be addressed.
Apart from focusing on the similarities between the different observer based techniques, their evidential value in case work is assessed, as well as recent criticism on these techniques. The latter includes the lack of data on error rates and the effect of context information on the expert’s decision making process. The requirement for setting-up a database to be able to objectify forensic examinations will be highlighted.
We will elaborate on two specific fields of interest, namely: fingerprints and ballistics.
For fingerprints we will go from the steps of collecting, visualising and assessing the quality of the fingerprint to identification. Furthermore the new developments and their potential in the field will be addressed.
For ballistics the essentials of trace comparisons and the reconstruction of a crime scene by use of physics will be discussed. This will prepare the students to work on a mock ballistic crime scene and to act as an expert in that examination. From a combination of their own findings, observer based comparisons and fictitious lab results events have to be reconstructed and a final overview of the findings of the crime scene has to be laid down.

Study materials

Other

Handouts of the presentations

Objectives

1. criticise the value of a specific technique in forensic case work for a given forensic field
2. evaluate the potential value of crime scene information, ballistic traces and terminal characteristics for a ballistic reconstruction
3. explain the possibilities and pitfalls of the available and developmental techniques associated with fingerprint examination and their role in identification
4. evaluate the different types of biasing information and the their possible influence on the interpretations of forensic comparisons
5. set-up a procedure to minimise the risk of the sources of bias
6. evaluate the requirements and criteria for database set-up to objectify the evidential value forensic comparisons
7. analyse and interpret the output of a LR-based database comparisons
8. evaluate and combine the different results of investigations and comparisons to support or falsify a previously formulated scenario

Teaching methods

Lecture
Computer lab session/practical training
Fieldwork/excursion
Presentation/symposium
Self-study

This course consists of lectures, tutorials and practicals.

In general, a topic will start with a lecture about (a part) of the theory after which you will receive either an individual or a team assignment. Presentations on assignments will be given on the next course day. The assignments will be given to illustrate the different concepts addressed during the module. In addition to the lectures, tutorial and practicals the student is expected to read the indicated literature. Due to scheduling some weeks of the course will be more demanding of the students’ time than others and the amount of literature will vary as well. We recommend students to study the schedule and plan the necessary hours for reading the literature at the beginning of the course.

The tutorial and all practicals are mandatory for the scheduled teams. To be able to offer every team the same material, the practicals will be given multiple times during a day. Because of limited time and space, each team should come to the appropriate scheduled session (cannot be exchanged).

Learning activities

Activity	Hours
Computerpracticum	2
Excursie	10
Hoorcollege	26
Practicum	8
Tentamen	3
Werkcollege	16
Self study	103
Total	168	(6 EC x 28 uur)

Attendance

Additional requirements for this course:

Students are supposed to be present in class. The student presentations, tutorials and practicals are compulsory for all students. When unable to attend please inform the instructor in good time to find a possible solution.

Assessment

Item and weight	Details
Final grade
50% Tentamen	Must be ≥ 5.5, Mandatory
2.5% Introduction case example	Must be ≥ 5.5, Mandatory
5% Presentation on a forensic field	Must be ≥ 5.5, Mandatory
5% Fingerprint approaches	Must be ≥ 5.5, Mandatory
30% Mock shooting scene 1	Must be ≥ 5.5, Mandatory
35% Mock shooting scene - upload reports
15% Examination request form
25% Report 1: Forensic firearms report
25% Report 2: Overall report
2.5% Ballistics tutorial	Must be ≥ 5.5, Mandatory
5% Bias / Forensic database	Must be ≥ 5.5, Mandatory

1a. Presentation
The oral presentations for the different forensic fields, bias in casework and the set-up of a database will be assessed on a group basis by a numerical grade given by instructors.

1b. Tutorials
A real case example will be assessed and their will by a computer tutorial coupled to the lectures on terminal ballistics.

2. Practicals
The mock crime scene will be assessed on multiple levels;
1) presentation and justification of prioritisations of investigations
2) quality of examination request form
3) final written assignments.

3. Written Examination
The final exam of this course will be a written examination based on the content covered during the lectures, tutorials, practicals and literature. The exam will be assessed on an individual basis.

All components will be graded on a scale from 1 to 10, with a maximum of one decimal after the point. These grades are used to calculate the final grade. In order to pass the course, all components and the final grade have to be sufficient, i.e. at least a five and a half. When a student has not fulfilled this requirement, the examiner will register the mark ‘did not fulfill all requirements’ (NAV) whether or not the averaged grade is sufficient.

The components will be weighted as follows:

Presentations and tutorials combined (20%, where the case example assignment and the tutorial terminal ballistics will constitute for 5 of the total 20%)
Practical (30%)
Written examination (50%)

LO	Tested in component	EQ 1	EQ 2	EQ 3	EQ 4	EQ 5	EQ 6	EQ 7	EQ 8	EQ 9	EQ 10
1	1, 3		x					x
2	1, 3	x	x					x
3	1, 3	x	x					x
4	1, 3							x	x
5	1, 3					x
6	1, 3	x				x		x	x
7	1, 3					x
8	1, 2, 3	x			x		x	x		x

Table of specification: the relation between the Learning Outcomes (LO) of the course, the assessment components of the course and the Exit Qualifications (EQ) of the Master’s Forensic Science (described in the Introduction in the Course Catalogue)

Assignments

The presentation

During the course there will be a few oral presentations for which every student is expected to participate by either presenting or by the answering of questions.

The tutorials

There will be two tutorials during the course. A real case example will be assessed and their will by a computer tutorial coupled to the lectures on terminal ballistics.

Assignment case example
The assignment for the case example will be assessed by the instructor and by other teams (peer review). The instructor will then assess the peer review as well. Each grade will be given by a conversion of a verbal scale to numerical (not delivered=0, unsatisfactory=4, satisfactory=6, good=8, excellent=10). The final grade for the assignment will be based on all three grades, equally weighted (for example: scenario students 8, scenario instructor 8, feedback instructor 6 – final grade: 7.3).

Tutorial terminal ballistics
The possible grade for the tutorial will be given by a conversion of a verbal scale to numerical (not delivered=0, unsatisfactory=4, satisfactory=6, good=8, excellent=10).

Assignment fingerprint approaches

The assignment on approaches in fingerprint evaluation will be assessed during the final presentation by the instructor. The presentation will also be part of the assessment. The grade will be given by a conversion of a verbal scale to numerical (not delivered=0, unsatisfactory=4, satisfactory=6, good=8, excellent=10).

The practicals

The mock crime scene will be assessed on multiple levels;
1) presentation and justification of prioritisations of investigations
2) quality of examination request form
3) final written assignments.

Level 1: A numerical grade will be given by the instructors.
Level 2: A verbal scale will be given by the instructors. The possible grade for the assignment will be given by a conversion of a verbal scale to numerical (not delivered=0, unsatisfactory=4, satisfactory=6, good=8, excellent=10).
Level 3: For each report a numerical grade will be given by the instructors. This grades will be multiplied by the number of persons in a team. The team members will divide the grades between each other based on their personal contributions with a maximum of minus 2 points from the given grade by the instructors.

Final grade = level 1 (35%) + level 2 (15%) + level (50%)

Fraud and plagiarism

The 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' applies to this course. This will be monitored carefully. Upon suspicion of fraud or plagiarism the Examinations Board of the programme will be informed. For the 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' see: www.student.uva.nl

Course structure

Weeknummer	Onderwerpen	Studiestof
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Timetable

The schedule for this course is published on DataNose.

Last year's course evaluation

In order to provide students some insight how we use the feedback of student evaluations to enhance the quality of education, we decided to include the table below in all course guides.

Observer Based Techniques (6 EC)	N=9
Strengths Overall the course was evaluated as positive The lectures and tutorials were very much appreciated, as well as the informal aspect of the course and the evaluation moment after the course. The students liked the fact the assignments did not overlap.	Notes for improvement The instructiveness of the fieldwork was not evaluated very well, because it lacked clear instructions for writing the report. The students found the Fingerprint practicals/presentations and the Introduction Case Example tutorial somewhat messy. It was not clear what was expected from the students and the feedback of one assignment was missing. The exam was, according to some students, too long.
Response lecturer: Students should at this stage know how to write and structure a forensic report. In addition, the students got to see an example on the first day of the course. Next year, it will be explicitly stated that the students can fall back on their previous experiences on writing a forensic report. Teacher agrees that it’s not a good idea to prepare presentations during the contact moments. In addition the fingerprint practical should build further on the students’ knowledge and not repeat it. There should have been a feedback moment on the scenarios, next year this will be done (but as a feedback moment, not a lecture) Indeed the exam is quite long. It is a mix of knowledge and in-depth questions. The teacher will make the exam shorter next year.

Contact information

Coordinator

E.J.A.T. Mattijssen MSc

Owner	Master Forensic Science
Coordinator	E.J.A.T. Mattijssen MSc
Part of	Master Forensic Science, year 2