Research and Innovation in Forensic Biophysics

Course manual 2025/2026

Course content

This course will start with an introduction in the concept of scientific methodology and the role of research in Forensic science. Exercises will be given which involve summarizing literature and extraction of research questions for follow up research. We will apply this knowledge, with increasing level during the course on several selected topics. Week 2 and 3 will be used to introduce the concepts of activity level analysis of traces and importance of the time line of events. Also, optics with a focus on microscopy will be introduced in week 2 and 3. In week 4 and 5, Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA) will be the central topic. Also for this topic, we will critically review currently used techniques for BPA, and write a scientific report, including the statistical accuracy of the measurements. Week 6 and 7 will cover aspects of forensic fingermark analysis, starting with an introduction and an overview of current research topics. The course will be concluded with writing a research proposal containing a summary of current research, research questions for follow–up research and a proper study design.

Study materials

Literature

• ARW Jackson, JM Jackson. Forensic Science (4th ed) 

• Inman K, Rudin N. The origin of the evidence. Forensic Sci Intl 2002; 126: 11-6.

Other

• Other key papers or books may be used. In that case, they will be available through the library, Canvas, or handed out during the meetings.

Objectives

• 1. estimate the forensic value of selected, routinely used, forensic methods using their knowledge of the scientific foundation (or the lack thereof) of these methods.
• 2. select relevant (scientifically good quality) articles, based on e.g. whether the study design and results lead to the reported conclusion, and the quality of the methodology & statistical analysis.
• 3. evaluate the degree of probability with which the conclusions in short lab reports, based on practical work in the fields of experimental hair comparison and blood pattern analysis, was drawn.
• 4. define research questions and be able to defend the methodological and statistical approach to answer the research questions and forensic/societal relevance.
• 5. explain basic knowledge of optics and its forensic applications (microscopy, alternate light sources) to optimally utilize them in various types of crime scenes, considering their limitations.
• 6. use knowledge on the physical properties of blood, blood droplets and blood patterns to estimate the possible volume of origin on a crime scene, considering the limitations of the analysis.
• 8. describe how different disciplines (like entomology, digital forensics) contribute to crime scene investigation.
• 9. apply knowledge on post-mortem body decomposition to determine the time of death and its accuracy in a case study.

Teaching methods

• Lecture
• Computer lab session/practical training
• Self-study
• Fieldwork/excursion

Learning activities

Attendance

Additional requirements for this course:

Attending all scheduled education activities is strongly advised. By doing so, you actively contribute to a lively learning community and significantly improve your chances of successfully completing the course. The designated mandatory activities play a crucial role in achieving the course objectives and are essential for your overall progress.

It is presupposed that all students will be present in class. More than 20% absence will automatically result in the loss of credit for that particular part of the course. 

If a practical is missed, the student must inform the teacher prior to the practical and the absence must be compensated with a literature assignment.

Assessment

All components will be graded on a scale from 1 to 10, with a maximum of one decimal after the point. These grades are used to calculate the final grade. In order to pass the course, all components and the final grade have to be sufficient, i.e. at least a five and a half. When a student has not fulfilled this requirement, the examiner will register the mark ‘did not fulfil all requirements’ (NAV) whether or not the averaged grade is sufficient.

The components will be weighted as follows:

1. Microscopy report on hair origin (10%, see also grading form on Canvas)
2. BPA report on point of origin (10%, see also grading form on Canvas))
3. Mini research proposal on BPA (20%, see also grading form on Canvas))
4. Research proposal on fingermarks (30%, see also grading form on Canvas))
5. Two sub exams (total of 30%)
   
   
   The final grade will be announced at the latest 15 working days after the final course activity (January 20th). Between this date and 35 working days after the final course activity (February 17h), a post-exam discussion or inspection moment will be planned. This will be announced on Canvas and/or via email
   
   

   		Exit qualifications
   Learning outcome	Components (see above)	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
   1	4,5								x
   2	3,4								x
   3	1,2				x
   4	4				x
   5	1,5		x
   6	2,3,5		x
   7	4,5		x
   8	5		x
   9	5		x

   Table of specification: the relation between the Learning Outcomes (LO) of the course, the assessment components of the course and the Exit Qualifications (EQ) of the Master’s Forensic Science (described in the Introduction in the Course Catalogue

Assignments

Microscopy report on hair origin

The microscopy practical consists of several parts which have to be completed in pairs. Before the start of the practical, a manual will be handed out to the student. During the practical work, the students will answer questions about the observations and the meaning of these observations. These questions have to be answered in the report. The last assignment is a hair comparison assignment which involves matching a hair of an unknown donor to a hair from the pallet of hairs with known donors.

The product (the report) will be assessed on a team base. For every question there will be a numerical grade given. (not delivered=0, unsatisfactory=4, satisfactory=6, good=8, excellent=10).

Report of the practical day at dordrecht 

The practical day at dordrecht will start with a general introduction about the 'ontwikkelplein' at dordrecht.  there will be 5 workshops:(1)Securing and reading digital traces , (2) Visualize latent fingerprints with dactyloscopic powder and tape lifts - (3) BPA blood, 3D measurements, (4) Detecting biological traces, using forensic light source, fluorescence, sampling - \(5) Shoe tracks and KIV. Five groups will be formed, and each group will attend all the workshops. As an assignment, they are asked to critically follow the workshops, and in the report, they should describe the strengths and weaknesses of the different techniques. Additionally, one technique must be described in detail on how it can be improved through scientific research. The format of the forensic report will be explained in the practical manual. The product (the report) will be assessed on a team base.

Mini research proposal on BPA/other topic

Based on the requirements for section of high quality articles, literature must be found to obtain knowledge on the current state and main (future) research direction in the field of BPA or the topic chosen in week 2.. The articles must be summarized and, based on the strength and weaknesses of the currently used methods, research questions must be defined. This results in a report in journal article form with a maximal length of two A4s.

The report will be assessed on an individual base for which a standard assessment form will be used (see Appendix 2c).

Research proposal on fingermarks

Based on the requirements for section of high quality articles, literature must be found to obtain knowledge on the current state and main (future) research direction in the field of BPA. A coherent overview must be composed and, based on the strength and weaknesses of the currently used methods, research questions must be defined and a research plan must be written which, according to the student, will advance the technique. This results in a research proposal. The format will be handed out at the beginning of the assignment.

The report will be assessed on an individual base for which a standard assessment form will be used (see Appendix 2d).

Final exam (2 subexams)

The exam of this course will be a written examination, based on the content covered during the lessons.

The final exam will be assessed on an individual base. The exam is designed to assess the theoretical and practical aspects related to the learning outcomes (see table above)

Fraud and plagiarism

The 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' applies to this course. This will be monitored carefully. Upon suspicion of fraud or plagiarism the Examinations Board of the programme will be informed. For the 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' see: www.student.uva.nl

Additional information

Use of GenAI in MFS
Within the Master Forensic Science, you are allowed to use Generative AI (GenAI) to support your learning process. For example, you can use large language models (LLMs) to help your self-study by generating flashcards or generating explanations of concepts. GenAI should be a support tool to help you reach the course's learning objectives, not a system to which you delegate activities that are meant to promote your learning. The course examiner has final say on which use cases are permissible or not within their course.

You may not use GenAI to create any content you submit for assessment, regardless of whether it's graded numerically or on a pass/fail basis. The only exception is if an assignment description explicitly allows GenAI use. In such cases, permissible use is delineated by the course instructor.

Never share personal information, research data, or course materials with a GenAI system, except for UvA AI Chat. This UvA-hosted system was built with GDPR compliance and data security in mind. If in doubt about sharing information, don't. You can always check with your course coordinator whether any intended use case is responsible. 

Teachers are never allowed to use GenAI to grade your work. They may, however, use it to formulate their feedback.

Use within RIFB

Contact information

Coordinator

• prof. dr. M.C.G. Aalders