Introduction to Interdisciplinary Research

7 EC

Semester 1, period 1, 2, 3

5244ITIR7Y

Owner Master Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Coordinator dr. J. van Kordelaar
Part of Master Brain and Cognitive Sciences,

Course manual 2024/2025

Course content

Interdisciplinarity can be a hard thing to pull off. While it is easy to see the value of recombining knowledge, insights or methods from different fields, researchers from disparate backgrounds can find it hard to work with each other. Experts from different fields speak different languages, laden with hidden assumptions and jargon that oh-so-subtly varies per discipline. Within science, it is already hard to balance open-mindedness with critical thinking and in a multidisciplinary context this problem becomes even harder.

Still, if we are ever to gain an understanding of mind, brain and the way in which they relate to each other, it will depend on the recombination of insights from cognitive science, philosophy, neurobiology, linguistics, artificial intelligence and more. This is why researchers in brain and cognitive sciences need to learn what interdisciplinarity is -- and how to get there.

This course offers tools to integrate theories from different fields and to think about how this integrated knowledge can be put to use. It is a project-based course: you will be working on a single topic in a group of student for the duration of the first semester. To boost the value of an interdisciplinary approach, the topics you can work on are big and often touch on societal or commercial needs. In fact, for some topics we collaborate with clients who have a vested interest in your interdisciplinary analysis.

The structure of the course is a method in its own right: you will be using a process akin to Design Thinking to explore scientific literature, check your understanding of the topic with experts and ideate an intervention that solves a real problem while remaining substantiated by the scientific knowledge you obtained during your exploration. During the design thinking process you will visualize knowledge through causal maps, hold critical conversations with your peers, interview experts from the field and you will learn how to quickly ideate solvable problems (and potential solutions).

During this course, you may often be invested mostly in the topic that you're working on, but it's the skills -- many of them soft and implicit -- that you pick up during the process that are most important. At the end of the course, you will find you are more confident in your ability to investigate and analyse complex problems, that you have some tools in your toolbox to visualise your knowledge and think critically and that you can communicate effectively about your own ideas.

Objectives

  • Demonstrate the ability to integrate theoretical frameworks from distinct disciplines using the integration-via-explanation approach
  • Collaborate effectively with student peers and domain experts to analyse a given research topic in an interdisciplinary fashion
  • Use effective science communication techniques in multiple formats, both across disciplines and towards society
  • Use the Design Thinking approach to perform interdisciplinary research and valorise academic knowledge.

Teaching methods

  • Seminar
  • Self-study
  • Working independently on e.g. a project or thesis
  • Lecture

The lectures in this course serve to explain the rationale behind the course and particular assignments. The seminars exist to have you practice the tools we offer, to discuss your progress with your tutor and also to just keep a cadence while you work on your project. The presentations are there to get feedback on your ideas from teachers and students alike. The self-study exists so that you can read up on the topic of your choosing. The project work is the core of this course and takes places both individually and in groups - it exists so that you experience all the challenges that come with interdisciplinary research.

Learning activities

Activity

Hours

Hoorcollege

4

Presentatie

6

Project

24

Werkcollege

52

Self study

110

Total

196

(7 EC x 28 uur)

Attendance

Requirements of the programme concerning attendance (OER-B):

  1. In the case of practicals, the student must attend at least 80%. Should the student attend less than 80%, he/she must redo the practical, or the Examinations Board may have one or more supplementary assignments issued.
  2. In the case of study-group sessions with assignments, the student must attend at least 80% of the study-group sessions. Should the student attend less than 80%, he/she must redo the study group, or the Examinations Board may have one or more supplementary assignments issued.

Assessment

Item and weight Details

Final grade

1 (14%)

Blog Post

1 (14%)

Critical Reflections

Must be ≥ 5

1 (14%)

Final Report

Must be ≥ 25

1 (14%)

Integrated Analysis

1 (14%)

Intervention Plan

1 (14%)

Reflection

1 (14%)

Solution Pitch

The final grade for the course is calculated as the total points obtained throughout the assignments (0 - 100), divided by 10. For the blog post (0 - 10 points) and the final report (0-40 points), a minimum score is required. Missing assignments or not meeting the minimal scores leads to a non-pass mark at the end of the course.

Fraud and plagiarism

The 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' applies to this course. This will be monitored carefully. Upon suspicion of fraud or plagiarism the Examinations Board of the programme will be informed. For the 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' see: www.student.uva.nl

Course structure

Weeknummer Onderwerpen Studiestof
1 Lecture: Introduction to Interdisciplinarity and IIR Chapter 4 of Keestra, Uilhoorn & Menken (found on Canvas).
2 Seminar: Team Charter  
3 Seminar: Divergent thinking  
4 Seminar: Mind Mapping  
5 Seminar: Causal Maps

Section 5.1.5 in Keestra Uilhoorn & Menken

6 Lecture: Critical Conversations  
7 Self-study  
8 Seminar: Critical thinking and causal maps  
9 Seminar: Looking for problems  
10 Seminar: Preparing for interviews  
11 Seminar: Progress Meetings  
12 Seminar: Mock Poster Session  
13 Seminar: Progress Meetings  
14 Seminar: Progress Meetings  
15 Christmas Break  
16 Christmas Break  
17 Christmas Break  
18 Lecture: Design thinking
Seminars: Solving the problem
 
19 Seminars: Solving the problem  
20 Dragon's Den (Pitches) + Report  
21 Writing Report  

Last year's student feedback

In order to provide students some insight how we use the feedback of student feedback to enhance the quality of education, we decided to include the table below in all course guides.

Course Name (#EC)N
Strengths
Notes for improvement
Response lecturer:

Contact information

Coordinator

  • dr. J. van Kordelaar