Course manual 2024/2025

Course content

The Research Designs course aims to provide you with the knowledge, skills and experience to be able to independently execute a research, starting with your Bachelor Project that runs parallel to this course. And it offers the necessary scaffolding to help you compose, firstly, a research proposal and, ultimately, a final research report. More specifically, it supports you in writing your thesis which you will complete immediately following the Research Design course.  

Each step of the course will be a workgroup guide to executing a research project and will allow you to develop further as scientific researcher, or as investigative professional in general. Given the large range of topics that you, as a group of Future Planet Students, are pursuing, we aim to provide material that is relevant to you, whether you go on to study

During the eight workgroups, you will work together with – within the same subject - and you will support each other in working out, first, a draft research proposal and, ultimately, a draft research report. The workgroups include a brief introduction, guided exercises, and peer assessment of each other’s work. To be able to get the most out of it, there are preparatory assignments that form the input for some of the workgroup’s exercises. If you utilize them wisely, the workgroups will allow you to successfully complete a well-structured draft proposal and research report which can form the basis for the thesis that you individually have to write for the Bachelor Project.

Study materials

Literature

  • Mandatory Literature on your topic - available on Canvas.

  • Buenz, Eric J. "Essential elements for high-impact scientific writing." Nature, 2019.

  • Gewin, Virginia. "How to write a first-class paper." Nature, vol. 555, pp. 129-130, 2018.

  • Patten, Mildred L., and Michelle Newhart. Understanding research methods: An overview of the essentials. Pp. 22-28, 84-86, Taylor & Francis, 2018.

  • Pontius, Jennifer, and Alan McIntosh. Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals. Pp. 23-44, Springer, Cham, 2020.

  • Van Loon, Emiel. Do well with your data: An instruction for data management during the BSc thesis project. 2019.

  • Bryman, Alan. Social research methods. Pp. 8-17, 160-179,384-413, Oxford university press. 2012.

Other

  • In the Research Design course we only provide you with a minimum amount of required reading on your problem topic, and this will be limited to the start of the course. Main reason being that in this course we aim to provide you with the necessary methodological knowledge to enable you to successfully execute your Bachelor Project and write a good research report (your thesis). Your supervisor and guiding teachers in the Bachelor Project will provide you with additional literature on your topic, to help you lay a good basis for your thesis. After the first weeks, you can tailor the papers and resources that you read to your particular research question and your individual needs as a researcher. Please consult the Additional Resources compiled for you in Canvas under Modules for a good place to start.

Objectives

  • Understand what the various elements of a research proposal entail.
  • Assess a Research Proposal or Research Report, using a standard set of criteria (i.e. rubrics).
  • Assess the accuracy of a formulated research problem, including the objectives and relevance of a proposed research question.
  • Assess the accuracy of the used literature and theoretical insights in relation to the proposed research question.
  • Assess the accuracy of methods involved in relevant data identification, collection, processing, analysis, visualization, and management.
  • Set up a Data Management Plan, including strategies for data collection, analysis & management.
  • Assess the accuracy of a results section, conclusions, and discussion section, given the gathered data.

Teaching methods

  • Lecture
  • Self-study
  • Supervision/feedback meeting
  • Working independently on e.g. a project or thesis
  • Seminar

During the lectures, you will learn and review topics that will help you to understand how research is designed, including how to navigate through relevant scientific literature, how to select appropriate methods, how to adequately handle, analyse and manage data, and how to properly write a scientific research report.

During the workgroups, you will receive support to help you develop and write your thesis by taking you through all the steps that every research project entails (see for further explanation the section on Assessment).

Learning activities

Activity

Amount

Hours

Lectures

5

10

Online Tutorials

2

4

Workgroups

8

16

Meeting with peer(s)

4

8

Self-Study 

130

130

Totaal

168

(6 EC x 28 uur)

Attendance

Programme's requirements concerning attendance (OER-B):

  • Participation in fieldwork is compulsory and cannot be replaced by assignments or other courses.
  • In case of practical sessions, the student is obliged to attend at least of 90% of the sessions and to prepare himself adequately, unless indicated otherwise in the course manual. In case the student attends less than 90%, the practical sessions should be redone entirely.
  • In case of tutorials/seminars with assignments, the student is obliged to attend at least 7 out of 8 seminars and to prepare thoroughly for these meetings, unless indicated otherwise in the course manual. If the course has more than 8 seminars, the student can miss up to 1 extra meeting for every (part of) 8 tutorials/seminars. If the students attends less than the mandatory tutorials/seminars, the course cannot be completed.

Additional requirements for this course:

In this course, the main focus of each class session will involve continuing discussions with your peers. Therefore, attendance in the workgroups is mandatory. We will be doing many in-class activities as well as peer reviewing during class time, so a missed workgroup is an inconvenience to your fellow classmates. If you have special circumstances (e.g. illness, family emergency), please email  your workgroup lecturer (“werkgroepdocent”). If you miss more than two workgroups (out of 8 total), you will be excluded from further participation and will not be able to complete the course.

Attendance in the lecture is not mandatory, but just as important to your success in the course. We work hard to make this course as useful for you as possible, so please respect our time by attending both the workgroups and lectures - they are ultimately for your benefit. Lectures will be recorded and uploaded to Canvas the day of the lecture. These will be available to view until the end of the course.

Assessment

Item and weight Details

Final grade

0.4 (40%)

Tentamen digitaal

0.6 (60%)

Peer Assessment Draft Research Report (60%)

Within Research Design we will first focus on how to write a research proposal, which entails:

  • Problem definition, including research question and aim & relevance of the research
  • Theoretical framework
  • Research design & methods
  • Expected results.

Later, we will cover all the components of a full thesis, i.e.:

  • Abstract
  • Problem definition, including the research question and aim & relevance of the research
  • Theoretical framework
  • Research design, methods & data handling (i.e. Data Management Plan)
  • Data collection & analysis
  • Conclusion, including reflection on the limitations of the research
  • Discussion, including reflection on societal impact & recommendations.

In the rubrics for the Research Design and Bachelor Thesis, you can find the criteria related to these components that together comprise your thesis. You need to familiarize yourself with these criteria, as you will be tested on both your theoretical knowledge about them and your skills to apply them.

The table below gives an overview of the various components of the Assessment, the deadlines and further details.

Table: Assessment, deadlines and exam dates

 Type of Assessment

Date / Deadline

Weight

Min. score

Com-pen-sable? 

Deadline re-sit 

(Theoretical) Exam on Research Components

April 7th, 2025

 

40%

 

5.5

No

Resit exam in June

Peer assessment of concept Research Proposal Including: Introduction, Problem Definition (with RQs), Theoretical Framework & Methods

April 10, 2025

 

-

Pass / Fail

No

In case you have failed to submit this assignment in time or if you cannot assess your own peer’s Research Proposal, you will be given another Research Proposal to assess.

Peer assessment of the concept Bachelor Report Including: Introduction, Problem Definition (with RQs), Theoretical Framework, Methods & Results

June 20, 2025

60%

< 5.5

No 

In case of a grade < 5.5 you need to revise your peer assessment. For the re-sit, you assess your peer’s final Bachelor Report*. The deadline of the second chance is in principle at the end of July, unless you and your teacher agree on another date

 

* In case it is not possible to review your peer’s final Bachelor Report, you will be given a Bachelor Report to assess, selected by your teacher. There will be a checklist available with minimum requirements. If your peer's proposal or thesis does not have all the checks, please contact your instructor.

 

 

 

Assessment diagram

Leerdoel: Toetsonderdeel 1: Toetsonderdeel 2:
#1. Understand what the various elements of a research proposal entail (level: Understand) Exam Peer Assessment
#2. Assess a Research Proposal or Research Report, using a standard set of criteria (i.e. rubrics) (level: Apply) Peer Assessment  
#3. Assess the accuracy of a formulated research problem, including the objectives and relevance of a proposed research question (level: Apply) Exam Peer Assessment
#4. Assess the accuracy of the used literature and theoretical insights in relation to the proposed research question (level: Apply) Peer Assessment  
#5. Assess the accuracy of methods involved in relevant data identification, collection, processing, analysis, visualization, and management (level: Apply)   Peer Assessment
#6.  Set up a Data Management Plan, including strategies for data collection, analysis & management (level:  Apply)    
#7. Assess the accuracy of a results section, conclusions, and discussion section, given the gathered data (level: Apply) Exam Peer Assessment

Students that were enrolled in the course in previous years

Students that were enrolled in the course in previous years and did not get a passing grade, will need to re-do the full course.
Students that were enrolled in the course in previous years with a passing grade, but who will conduct their BSc thesis this year are encouraged to participate in the working groups, as these are supporting the proposal and thesis writing of the BSc thesis project. Please contact Rosa van Schaick (r.vanschaick@uva.nl) for more information.

Inspection of assessed work

You will have a second chance to submit an improved peer assessment within 2 weeks after receiving the final grade with a maximum grade of 6.0. The deadline for resubmission will be communicated to you once we have completed grading. 

Assignments

The assessment will happen in a threefold way:

  1. You will be tested on your theoretical knowledge about the research components in an exam, which counts for 40% of your grade.
  2. And you need to be able to show that you can work with these criteria yourself when you use the rubrics to assess the draft proposal and thesis of your peer, which counts for 60% of your grade. This assignment is based on our expectation and experience that this ability will also benefit you in writing your own proposal and thesis.

Fraud and plagiarism

The 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' applies to this course. This will be monitored carefully. Upon suspicion of fraud or plagiarism the Examinations Board of the programme will be informed. For the 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' see: www.student.uva.nl

Course structure

 

Week

Topic Lecture

 

Mandatory readings

Preparatory Assignments

1/11

How to write a research
proposal and thesis

How to generate a problem definition

 

Pontius 2020, Chapter 3: Navigating Scientific Literature, p. 23-33

Bryman, Alan. Social research methods. Pp. 8-17 (elements of the process of social research), Oxford university press. 2012.

Patten 2018, Topic 3: The role of theory in research, p. 8-11

Read Course Manual and study assessment criteria as described in rubrics

Fill in Google Docs form about preferred research topic (what & why)

2/12

How to formulate good research questions

Analysing literature search findings, using the Data Management Table +

Formulating a research question

 

 

Pontius 2020, Chapter 4: Critical Thinking, p. 35-44

Patten 2018, Topic 24: Research Hypotheses, p. 84-86 & Topic 7: Quantitative and qualitative research: key differences, p. 22-24

Bryman, Alan. Social research methods. Pp. 160-179 & 384-413, Oxford university press. 2012.

Read the mandatory paper or article about your problem topic and - based on this and other relevant literature - formulate at least one research question that interests you

3/13

       

4/14

Data Collection - How to decide what type of data needs to be collected and how this can be done

Deciding on an adequate research design for your specific research question and selecting appropriate methods

Bryman, Alan. Social research methods. Pp. 160-179 & 384-413, Oxford university press. 2012.

 

Patten 2018, Topic 8: Quantitative and qualitative research decisions, p. 25-28

 

Bring the first draft of your methodology

5/15

 

Peer assessment & feedback on draft Research Proposal

 

Exam (40%)

Deadline proposal

6/16

 

 

 

 

7/17

 

Use of GenAI, review of peer assessment and major specific data collection methods

Buenz 2019
Gewin 2018

 

8/18

No lessons

9/19

 

Project management

 

 

10/20

 

 

 

 

11/21

 

 

 

 

12/22

 

Scientific writing; how to write a discussion/conclusion

 

 

13/23

 

Presenting scientific writing -specialized for each major

 

 

14/25

 

 

 

DEADLINE Peer Assessment concept Bachelor Report (60%) 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional information

We vinden het belangrijk dat je je op de UvA en bij Future Planet Studies veilig voelt. Krijg je onverhoopt te maken met ongewenst gedrag of voel je je onveilig, dan kun je terecht bij verschillende personen. Je melding wordt altijd vertrouwelijk behandeld. Kijk op onze website voor meer informatie over waar en bij wie je terecht kunt.

It is important that everyone feels safe at the UvA and Future Planet Studies. We are committed to provide social safety and we offer various forms of support for people experiencing inappropriate or unsafe situations. Consult the UvA website or Future Planet Studies Canvas page for more information and contact info.

Last year's student feedback

Vanaf 2013-2014 hebben we ervoor gekozen om d.m.v. onderstaande tabel de studenten meer inzicht te geven in de kwaliteitszorg. Daarom nemen we een korte weergave van de studentenevaluatie op en de daaruit voortvloeiende acties ter verbetering van het vak.

Research Designs (6EC) 53 responses 128 students
Sterke punten
  • Students are very satisfied about the level and workload of the course.
  • Students are very satisfied about the critical thinking skills in the course.
Suggesties ter verbetering
  • The tutorials had too many presentations.
  • Subjects did not relate to BSc thesis.
  • Writing two proposals back to back is redundant.
Reactie docent:
  • We have changed the research proposal from a group project to an individual project, based on the thesis topic of the student. This way students do not need to write two proposals back to back, and all students write their proposal on their BSc thesis topic.
  • Tutorial activities will be restructured to encompass a wider range of classroom activities.

Contact information

Coordinator

  • A.G. Uilhoorn MSc

Docenten

  • Daniël Kooij/Anne Uilhoorn
  • Kavel Ozturk
  • Lieke Mulder
  • Jaap Rothuizen
  • Jordy Willems