6 EC
Semester 1, period 2, 3
5132FOTC6Y
|
Activity |
Hours |
|
|
Lectures |
16 |
|
|
Exam |
3 |
|
|
Working groups |
12 |
|
|
Individual research project |
67 |
|
|
Self study |
70 |
|
|
Total |
168 |
(6 EC x 28 uur) |
Programme's requirements concerning attendance (OER-B):
Additional requirements for this course:
Attending all scheduled education activities is strongly advised. By doing so, you actively contribute to a lively learning community and significantly improve your chances of successfully completing the course. The designated mandatory activities play a crucial role in achieving the course objectives and are essential for your overall progress. By registering for this course, you are complying with the rules regarding attendance and agreeing to actively prepare for and participate in the mandatory activities.
| Item and weight | Details |
|
Final grade | |
|
50% On-site digital exam | Must be ≥ 5.5, Mandatory |
|
30% Individual research project | Mandatory |
|
20% Reflections on individual research project | Mandatory |
| Learning objective: | Exam | Individual assignment | Reflections |
|---|---|---|---|
|
#1. Explain the interrelationships between cities and food systems, and the shift towards a re-localized food system |
X | ||
|
#2. Using theoretical insights pertaining to the urban food system and food practices to qualitatively investigate and analyse actual issues in a local context |
X | X | |
|
#3. Explain the spatial arrangements, institutional designs and value systems of different food systems, and their impact on cities |
X | X | X |
|
#4. Explain the role of urban planning in the transition towards a re-localized food system |
X | X | X |
|
#5. Students can independently set-up and conduct an interview with experts or relevant stakeholders, and apply qualitative analysis tools to interpret the data |
X | ||
|
#6. Critically reflect on the shift towards a re-localized food system, and the contribution of urban planning |
X |
Students who were enrolled previously have to re-do the exam, but not necessarily the assignment. Please consult the course coordinator in the first week of the course.
Inspection of assessed work will take place during the seminars.
In the individual research project in block 2, students will carry out a qualitative research project pertaining the food system of Amsterdam.
In the reflection assignment in block 3, students will reflect upon their findings by relating them to a case study elsewhere (comparative perspective) and by reflecting upon the role of urban planning.
The 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' applies to this course. This will be monitored carefully. Upon suspicion of fraud or plagiarism the Examinations Board of the programme will be informed. For the 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' see: www.student.uva.nl
| Date |
Activity | Lecturer(s) |
Content | Reading material |
| 28-10 | Lecture 1 | JW | Introduction to food and the city |
Pothukuchi, K., & Kaufman, J. L. (1999). Placing the food system on the urban agenda: The role of municipal institutions in food systems planning. Agriculture and Human Values, 16(2), 213-224. Wiskerke, J. S. (2009). On places lost and places regained: Reflections on the alternative food geography and sustainable regional development. International Planning Studies, 14(4), 369-387. |
| 31-10 | WG1 | MK+SvM | Foodscapes of Amsterdam + Research focus |
|
| 04-11 | Lecture 2 | JW | Urban food security and food democracy |
Bornemann, B., & Weiland, S. (2022) Urban Food Democracy. Chapter 7 in: Moragues-Faus, A., Clark, J.K., Battersby, J., & Davies, A. (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of Urban Governance. Routledge, London Sonnino, R. (2016). The new geography of food security: exploring the potential of urban food strategies. The Geographical Journal, 182(2), 190-200. |
| 06-11 | Deadline research proposal | |||
| 07-11 | WG2 | MK+SvM | Key concepts + Operationalisation |
|
| 11-11 | Lecture 3 | JW | Qualitative research on the urban food system |
Pinkster, F. (2020) Interviewing in urban research. Chapter 5 in: Verloo, N. & Bertolini, L. (Eds.) Seeing the City: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Study of the Urban. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam Kortright, R., & Wakefield, S. (2011). Edible backyards: A qualitative study of household food growing and its contributions to food security. Agriculture and Human Values, 28, 39-53. |
| 14-11 | WG3 | MK+SvM | Data collection: interviewing | |
| 18-11 | Lecture 4 | JW | Everyday food practices in the Global North |
Lapiņa, L., & Leer, J. (2016). Carnivorous heterotopias: Gender, nostalgia and hipsterness in the Copenhagen meat scene. Norma, 11(2), 89-109. Alkon, A. H., & Cadji, J. (2020). Sowing seeds of displacement: Gentrification and food justice in Oakland, CA. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 44(1), 108-123. |
| 21-11 | No WG | |||
| 25-11 | Lecture 5 | JW | Food systems and transitions |
Hebinck, A., Selomane, O., Veen, E., de Vrieze, A., Hasnain, S., Sellberg, M., ... & Wood, A. (2021). Exploring the transformative potential of urban food. npj urban sustainability, 1(1), 38. Born, B., & Purcell, M. (2006). Avoiding the local trap: Scale and food systems in planning research. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(2), 195-207. |
| 27-11 | Deadline interview | |||
| 28-11 | WG4 | MK+SvM | Data analysis: Atlas.ti | |
| 02-12 | Lecture 6 | JW | Urban food policymaking & planning |
Cabannes & Marocchino (2018) Food and urban planning: The missing link. Chapter 1 in: Cabannes & Marocchino (Eds.) Integrating Food into Urban Planning. UCL Press, London Sibbing, L., Candel, J., & Termeer, K. (2021). A comparative assessment of local municipal food policy integration in the Netherlands. International Planning Studies, 26(1), 56-69. |
| 20-12 | Deadline individual research project |
|||
| Christmas break | ||||
| 06-01 | Lecture 7 | JW | Everyday food practices in the Global South |
Parnell, S., & Robinson, J. (2012). (Re) theorizing cities from the Global South: Looking beyond neoliberalism. Urban Geography, 33(4), 593-617. Battersby, J., & Watson, V. (2018). Improving urban food security in African cities. Critically assessing the role of informal retailers. Chapter 9 in: Cabannes & Marocchino (2018). Integrating Food into Urban Planning. FAO. |
| 09-01 | WG5 | MK+SvM | Comparative perspective | Chapter from FAO book |
| 13-01 | Lecture 8 | CU + SS | Civic food initiatives |
Renting, H., Schermer, M., & Rossi, A. (2012). Building food democracy: Exploring civic food networks and newly emerging forms of food citizenship. The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 19(3), 289-307. Cameron, J., & Wright, S. (2014). Researching diverse food initiatives: from backyard and community gardens to international markets. Local Environment, 19(1), 1-9. |
| 16-01 | WG6 | MK+SvM | Role of urban planning |
De Zeeuw, H. & Dubbeling, M. (2015) Process and tools for multi-stakeholder planning of the urban agro/food system. In: De Zeeuw, H. & Drechsel, P. (2015) Cities and Agriculture. Developing Resilient Urban Food Systems. London: Routledge, pp.56-87. https://ruaf.org/document/cities-and-agriculture-developing-resilient-urban-food-systems/ Additional material: The Community and Regional Food Planning Policy Guide (USA), see https://www.planning.org/policy/guides/adopted/food.htm |
| 24-01 | Deadline reflections |
|||
| 31-01 | Exam at USC Sporthal 1 (13.30-15.30) |
|||
| 02-04 | Re-take exam |
|||
It is important that everyone feels safe at the UvA and Future Planet Studies. We are committed to provide social safety and we offer various forms of support for people experiencing inappropriate or unsafe situations. Consult the UvA website or Future Planet Studies Canvas page for more information and contact info.
In order to provide students some insight how we use the feedback of student feedback to enhance the quality of education, we decided to include the table below in all course guides.
| Course Name (#EC) | N | |
Strengths
|
Notes for improvement
|
|
Response lecturer:
|
||