Higher Cognitive Functions

5 EC

Semester 1, period 1

5244HICF5Y

Owner Master Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Coordinator dr. S. Pezzelle
Part of Master Brain and Cognitive Sciences, domain Cognitive Science,

Course manual 2023/2024

Course content

Within the cognitive sciences, there is often talk of higher and lower cognitive functions. As a heuristic, this categorization can serve a purpose: studies into reasoning, language use, creativity, musicality or deliberation are in many ways different from studies into perception or reaction time. Yet at the same time, it is not always clear how to demarcate 'high cognition' and 'low cognition', with different fields and methodologies bringing about different perspectives on what these terms mean to begin with.

The course Higher Cognitive Functions aims to showcase studies into some faculties that have classically been considered to be of a high level, such as language use, decision-making, and theory of mind. Students will learn how current insights on these topics have historically been constructed, what light they shed on the functioning of our minds, which debates are still ongoing and how theories of cognition are moving forward.

Study materials

Literature

  • selected papers

Objectives

  • Place current research in cognitive science in its historic context
  • Understand important outstanding issues in cognitive science
  • Critically discuss developments in the field with experts
  • Integrate ideas from distinct subfields in cognitive science
  • Identify ethical aspects of and best practices for research in cognitive science

Teaching methods

  • Lecture
  • Seminar
  • Self-study
  • Presentation/symposium
  • Working independently on e.g. a project or thesis

Interactive lectures on current research will illustrate knowledge construction in the cognitive sciences.

Students will prepare interviews with experts to critically evaluate research and report on interviews/lectures.

Students will develop a research proposal to address key debates empirically, drawing on findings from multiple lines of research.

 

Learning activities

Activity

Number of hours

Lectures

20

Readings

80

Assignments

40

Total

140

Attendance

Requirements of the programme concerning attendance (OER-B):

  1. In the case of practicals, the student must attend at least 80%. Should the student attend less than 80%, he/she must redo the practical, or the Examinations Board may have one or more supplementary assignments issued.
  2. In the case of study-group sessions with assignments, the student must attend at least 80% of the study-group sessions. Should the student attend less than 80%, he/she must redo the study group, or the Examinations Board may have one or more supplementary assignments issued.

Additional requirements for this course:

Students should attend at least all but one interview sessions and write a weekly report on each session (except when they are hosting it). The effect of missing a session on the grade is that no credits are given for that session. Interview attendance counts for in total 25%; this percentage can be obtained by attending  (and writing a report for) all sessions but one.

The final essay  cannot be revised if the total grade is sufficient, but a new essay (on another topic) can be written.In case the total grade is not sufficient, it is also possible to revise the final essay based on the feedback. The new grade will be used to calculate a new overall grade, but this grade cannot exceed 7.0 (so, if the recalculated grade is below 7.0, it is the new grade; else the new grade is 7.0).

Assessment

Item and weight Details

Final grade

30%

Interview hosting

Interview Music Perception

Interview Information search and Interaction

Interview Affordances and Skilled action

Interview Language and Statistical learning

Interview Episodic Memory

45%

Final essay

Final Essay

25%

Weekly Assignments (3 per student; individual)

1 (20%)

Weekly assignment Music Perception

1 (20%)

Weekly assignment Information search and Interaction

1 (20%)

Weekly assignment Affordances and Skilled action

1 (20%)

Weekly assignment Language and Statistical learning

1 (20%)

Weekly assignment Episodic Memory

Assignments

Interview hosting

  • Students will be tasked to interview a visiting speaker, in groups

Interview/lecture attendance

  • Students will individually write a one-page report on each guest lecture. There is no specific grading on this part; students get the full credit if they attend all sessions or all but one, and hand in serious reports for the attended sessions.

Final essay: literature comparison

  • Students will write an essay comparing and integrating the viewpoints of two disciplines (from two different lecturers) on one topic.

Essay topic pitch

  • Students (individually) give a short presentation on the topic of their final essay. This assignment will not be graded.

Fraud and plagiarism

The 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' applies to this course. This will be monitored carefully. Upon suspicion of fraud or plagiarism the Examinations Board of the programme will be informed. For the 'Regulations governing fraud and plagiarism for UvA students' see: www.student.uva.nl

Course structure

Week Topics
1 Music perception
2 Information search and interaction
3 Affordances and skilled action
4 Language and statistical learning
5 Episodic memory
6 Student presentations
7 Essay submission

Timetable

The schedule for this course is published on DataNose.

Additional information

Specific course materials will be available to participants via Canvas.

Last year's student feedback

In order to provide students some insight how we use the feedback of student evaluations to enhance the quality of education, we decided to include the table below in all course guides.

Higher Cognitive Functions (5 EC)    
Strengths
  • Literature and level of speakers were good
  • Proposal assignment was instructive
Notes for improvement
  • Too strong a focus on language
  • Day tests did not aid understanding
  • Workload relatively low
Response lecturer:
  • The bias towards language should be remedied, although language is a useful faculty to discuss core debates in cognitive science
  • Effort will be made to get a more diverse array of speakers in
  • We will think of an alternative to or improvement of the day tests

Contact information

Coordinator

  • dr. S. Pezzelle